Alex Jones Doesn’t Want to Talk About White Supremacy

Tech News

Alex Jones is a prominent far-right radio host and conspiracy theorist.

Alex Jones is a notable considerably-correct radio host and conspiracy theorist.
Graphic: Drew Angerer (Getty Pictures)

Alex Jones has a large amount to say—just not on the subject matter of white supremacy. In a Connecticut courtroom doc submitted Wednesday, Jones’ authorized crew motioned to restrict expert testimony on white supremacy and much-appropriate extremism as section of an ongoing lawsuit from Jones in reaction to his responses surrounding the Sandy Hook Elementary University shooting.

To place it kindly, Alex Jones is an alt-ideal radio host, owner of InfoWars, and all close to controversial male. A popular peddler of conspiracy theories from chemicals turning frogs gay to weather transform as a hoax, arguably Jones’ most renowned (and inflammatory) responses consist of people built regarding the tragic faculty taking pictures at Sandy Hook Elementary Faculty that shattered the Connecticut city of Newtown just about ten decades ago.

Jones alleged that the Sandy Hook university capturing was a hoax, which, the natural way, struck a chord with the mother and father who misplaced their kids in the shooting, major a team of them to file a defamation lawsuit in Connecticut in 2018. The courtroom filings have been steadily trickling in because then, but this week, Alex Jones’ lawful staff has motioned to forbid the presentation of proof with regards to white supremacy and significantly-right extremism in the nevertheless-to-be-scheduled trial. The movement in limine reads:

The plaintiffs have disclosed several opportunity pro witnesses. At least two of them, Dr. Heidi Beirich and Oren Sagal, may possibly, in accordance to the disclosures, attempt to testify on the topics of white supremacy and suitable-wing extremism. Furthermore, the plaintiffs may well request to introduce proof on these subjects through other witnesses and displays. No matter the supply, proof relating to these topics is irrelevant, would be an attack on the defendants’ character and play to the feelings of the jury and distract from the major troubles.

Jones’ lawful crew further more argues that evidence involving the subject areas of white supremacy and far-proper extremism are irrelevant in this scenario and should not be released through the court listening to, and that introduction of these topics is a ploy by the plaintiffs to distract the courtroom from the situation at hand. “Attempts to affiliate the defendants with people today who espouse racist or extreme views would volume to poor character proof,” the doc elaborates.

This is not Jones’ only lawful entanglement pertaining to a school capturing. Jones is struggling with a comparable defamation lawsuit in Texas around the Sandy Hook university taking pictures, which Jones attempted to wriggle out of lawful fines and likely harm payments by submitting for bankruptcy for 3 of his companies, including InfoWars. Jones was also sued for defamation in Texas by a guy that Jones falsely determined as the shooter in the 2018 Stoneman Douglas Significant College shooting in Parkland, Florida.

Sharing is caring!

Facebook Comments

Leave a Reply