I’ve Been Drinking Rainwater the Past Two Years. Is It Time To Stop?

We’re virtually two months into the monsoon time in the US Southwest, and in that time well in excess of 2,000 gallons of rainwater has fallen on to the roof of my smaller off-grid dwelling, in which it is been caught and diverted into two substantial tanks in my backyard. This water is pumped by means of a filter and into the residence to be employed for almost everything from laundry to drinking, but lately a rash of headlines have been shouting at me that my water is crammed with “without end chemical substances,” building it unsafe to eat.

So do I want to go back again to hauling our drinking water from a local community nicely 5 miles down the street, 200 gallons at a time, to be safe?

Whilst new interim suggestions from the US Environmental Security Agency would appear to be to decide all rain on Earth unsafe to drink, I am not ripping down the gutters and piping I just finished setting up a couple months ago. At minimum not however. 

All this issue about tainted rain is tied to something termed PFAS (perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances) that arrives from chemical substances utilised in firefighting, industrial resources, landfills, wastewater remedy, and even shampoos and packaging. Some reports have proven opportunity inbound links in between PFAS publicity and decreased fertility, developmental troubles in kids, enhanced hazard of some cancers and lowered immune program functionality.  

These created substances are incredibly gradual to split down, possible creating them ubiquitous in our surroundings, which includes in groundwater that evaporates and floats over our heads, exactly where it travels on the wind and atmospheric currents in advance of finally returning to the floor as rainwater. A minuscule proportion of that rainwater falls on to my roof in New Mexico, runs through a sequence of gutters, hoses, screens, filters, tanks, pumps and other plumbing ahead of coming out of a handful of kitchen or rest room spigots in the household. 

You would feel rain falling on a comparatively isolated substantial-desert locale surrounded by general public lands would be in a quite pristine state, but in a earth where by microplastics transform up in the Arctic and the even bigger bits form a miniature floating continent in the Pacific, I’m beginning to wonder if pristine is likely extinct. 

Location my rain catchment process up was section of my most epic pandemic job, the unfinished, off-grid home my loved ones moved into in April 2020. It was only in the previous couple of months that I extra the last lengths of gutter to the roof of our yard storage drop to sense self-confident I was maximizing our rain catchment prospective. 

Consuming drinking water immediate from the sky.


Johanna DeBiase

And then this month, the headlines commenced screaming at me that I was poisoning my spouse and children in carrying out so. And this isn’t really an additional situation of tabloid or clickbait headlines exaggerating or getting factors out of context. The sweeping conclusion is coming from the mouths of researchers them selves. 

“Based mostly on the hottest US recommendations for PFOA [one particular kind of PFAS] in ingesting h2o, rainwater all over the place would be judged unsafe to consume,” Ian T. Cousins, a professor of environmental science at Stockholm College, explained in a assertion.

Cousins is guide writer of a analyze published Aug. 2 in the journal Environmental Science and Technology that declares a “planetary boundary” for PFAS contamination of our environment has been exceeded. 

In contrast to other urgent environmental challenges, even so, what has improved in how we perspective PFAS contamination is just not necessarily the level of it in the setting. Just one of the greatest producers of the substances, 3M, stopped earning them many years in the past, and the total of PFAS in our atmosphere has in fact been comparatively steady through that time period.

What is various now are the benchmarks for appropriate quantities of PFAS in the environment that regulators and health and fitness officers have made the decision we must purpose for. 

“There is heightened problem regarding ingestion/inhalation of PFAS thanks to the very lower threshold restrict that can cause adverse human wellbeing impacts,” Sudarshan Kurwadkar, an environmental engineer and professor at California State University, Fullerton, told me. 

That problem led the EPA in June to introduce new drinking water overall health advisories for PFAS. The steerage sets the goal focus amounts for PFAS in ingesting h2o so small as to quite possibly exceed the capabilities of existing testing and monitoring technology. 

“From the point of view of a chemist, the new degrees will be hard to examine,” Jennifer A. Faust, a chemistry professor at the Higher education of Wooster, claimed through electronic mail. “For PFOA (C8), the new advisory stage is 4 pg/L (picograms for every liter), but the EPA’s have strategy for analyzing PFOA in drinking drinking water are unable to confidently detect anything considerably less than about 500 pg/L.”

pxl-20201215-183928403

Snowmelt could be contaminated too. 


Johanna DeBiase

But Faust would not discounted the new restrictions, pointing out that the EPA based mostly them on recent toxicology and wellbeing investigation. 

“Considering the fact that the US EPA advisory stage is decrease than most analytical detection boundaries, it follows that nearly any detections of PFAS will exceed advisory amount,” stated Stu Khan from the University of New South Wales in Australia.

So the uneasy predicament that the new investigation from Cousins and colleagues seeks to outline is this: Our globe appears to be loaded with a substance, mainly produced for the duration of earlier generations, that sticks about for a really extended time. It would be handy if there was much more study on the likely wellness impacts of this stuff, but it is protected to assume we might really be better off if it was not about at all, at the very least in our drinking h2o, that is. 

PFAS screening and filtration

This truth also further more muddies the challenge of no matter if I really should be drinking the important rain that falls on my desert property.

Following all, Faust pointed out to me, “a 2021 study by a team of scientists from Johns Hopkins uncovered PFOA concentrations in bottled drinking water ranged from 170 pg/L to 2,000 pg/L.”

So if bottled water has up to 500 occasions the EPA’s advisable limit for PFAS, can my at-residence rainwater-dependent Sodastream refreshments basically be a great deal even worse?

“If the remote region you currently live in is not susceptible to lengthy-range atmospheric transportation of air-borne PFAS, you need to be fine,” Kurwadkar instructed me.

Of program, I have no notion how vulnerable I am to permanently chemicals hitching a trip across the environment high in the sky ahead of dropping on my house inside of a million little rain drops — I didn’t indication up for regardless of what top quality subscription might notify me that.

There are ways to obtain out, even though. A number of providers offer you house exam kits to test for PFAS in your drinking h2o. A variety of labs will examine h2o samples for you for about $200 to $300, but I’ve requested a package from Cyclopure, which offers an $80 mail-in take a look at. 

It will just take a couple of weeks to get benefits for my have water, but I will be positive to write an update when they arrive in. 

Meanwhile, Faust reminds me that there are selections to relieve postindustrial apocalyptic anxieties other than panicking over the toxic sky falling.

“I don’t have a obvious answer for you on whether or not switching h2o resources will decreased your PFAS ingestion, but if you are very anxious, you could appear into filtration methods with granular activated carbon for PFAS removing.”

Introducing a GAC filter to a household plumbing program is a reasonably uncomplicated activity, but it is nevertheless a plumbing task, which are not often essentially uncomplicated when compared with most other responsibilities in life. An additional alternative is a reverse osmosis filtration technique, and there are countertop selections offered to filter drinking h2o that don’t have to have any plumbing function. 

At times when know-how turns out to be poisonous, our only alternative is to flip to even extra tech for salvation. So for now, I am sticking with consuming from the sky though I wait for my results to appear in and start comparing filtration alternatives just in situation. 

Sharing is caring!

Facebook Comments

Leave a Reply