In December 2000, the Sci-Fi Channel (given that renamed Syfy) introduced Frank Herbert’s Dune, an ambitious 3-aspect miniseries. Science fiction author Rajan Khanna was a modern college or university grad when he first viewed the clearly show.
“I recall it coming out, and I keep in mind truthfully the Sci-Fi Channel remaining a significant deal back again in the day,” Khanna claims in Episode 515 of the Geek’s Information to the Galaxy podcast. “This was just before there was all this geek stuff just about everywhere. It was form of like, ‘This is for us,’ in a way.”
With a spending budget of $20 million, Frank Herbert’s Dune was an bold challenge for the fledgling network. The series won an Emmy for specific results and was just one of the channel’s optimum-rated systems. But Tv set author Andrea Kail warns that modern audiences will not just be blown absent by the show’s production values. “I have a really distinct memory of just one unique shot exactly where Jessica and Paul are running absent from the ornithopters, and they are jogging in position in front of a lousy eco-friendly monitor,” she states. “It was like viewing a play staying filmed. It was not a motion picture, it was a participate in that anyone pointed a digicam at.”
Geek’s Guide to the Galaxy host David Barr Kirtley agrees that the show has its challenges, but he liked a subplot involving Princess Irulan, a minor character in the novel who was fully omitted from the current film. “Dune is a mixture of ‘space opera court docket intrigue’ and ‘hippie Lawrence of Arabia,’” he claims. “Those are the two factors. I like the space opera courtroom intrigue stuff significantly additional. [Irulan’s] storyline ongoing the house opera court docket intrigue stuff by way of the total story, so I really definitely liked that a ton.”
Science fiction writer Matthew Kressel claims the excellent of the fundamental content shines by way of regardless of any tough edges. In certain he liked how the collection captures the texture of the novel. “I really like the Villeneuve motion picture, of course, but it is a very frenetic movie,” he states. “I truly feel like there was a little something about this series that took its time telling the tale, and I highly regarded that.”
Hear to the full job interview with Rajan Khanna, Andrea Kail, and Matthew Kressel in Episode 515 of Geek’s Information to the Galaxy (higher than). And examine out some highlights from the discussion below.
Andrea Kail on Frank Herbert’s Dune vs. Dune (1984):
This [miniseries] will make the Lynch model search like the Denis Villeneuve edition, and the Lynch variation would make the Villeneuve variation glance like a movie shipped by the hand of God. Which is how a lot this propped almost everything else up … The [Lynch version] is a terrible film, but I will never not look at it if it is on. It is a bad movie, but it’s compellingly poor. I generally sit and view it because it is a spectacle. This? I appreciate Dune, but I will not sit and view this again. Do you see the difference? The [Lynch version] is visually intriguing and there is a great deal likely on. This is not a thing I would ever enjoy once more willingly, and I’m a Dune fanatic.
Matthew Kressel on special consequences:
There were some areas the place they did not even do a matte portray, they just had a backdrop that they unrolled powering the actors. That’s an odd alternative, mainly because maybe they did not have the money for a matte painting, but they absolutely experienced environmentally friendly screens by this position. So I was incredibly curious about that … We’re spoiled by the distinctive consequences currently. They’re so fantastic, every thing seems serious. It is flawless. But we sort of overlook that that was genuinely, genuinely challenging to attain. Even Star Wars, which experienced this enormous finances, you enjoy the original one—not the remaster—and it’s like, “Yeah, the Loss of life Star is a design.” You can just inform on the shut-up photographs.
David Barr Kirtley on Frank Herbert’s Dune vs. Dune (2021):
The Villeneuve film basically does not demonstrate everything. “Mentats? Really do not stress about it. Guild Navigators? Do not stress about it, it is not important.” It just focuses on telling a compelling, psychological character story. The [miniseries] tries to clarify a lot extra of the earth-setting up, and which is actually negative in a large amount of ways—dramatically—but I feel like if you look at this you truly know additional about the planet and what comes about in the ebook than you would from looking at the Villeneuve movie—which is a million instances far better, but it is built a trade-off of remarkable efficiency vs . globe-creating explication.
Rajan Khanna on adaptation:
I think this [miniseries] is one particular of the examples of how staying trustworthy to a e book can be a trap, because what you finish up with is a box-examining exercise and not a whole lot of life. All of the fantastic diversifications condense items, smush points collectively, lower points out. Lord of the Rings is widely regarded as an remarkable adaptation, and they slash all sorts of points. There is usually any individual who’s like, “Tom Bombadil!” But Tom Bombadil wanted to go … You have to make people choices. I feel this is an illustration of being trustworthy but also currently being flat and not acquiring a ton of coronary heart or electrical power. So I would not suggest this for everyone besides hardcore Dune historians.